Partially Professional

Archive

Posts Tagged ‘Milton Friedman’

Who was Milton Friedman?

May 11th, 2010 Josh Fields View Comments

Milton Friedman is my favorite economist of all time, and I wrote this paper about him. He has an interesting story and mind, unlike most economists today he encouraged debate.

"A society that puts equality before freedom will get neither. A society that puts freedom before equality will get a high degree of both." - Milton Friedman

Before all the static and political fostering of the recent economic crisis, a great man passed away on November 16, 2006 at the age of 94. Milton Friedman was that man, and he insightfully clung to the belief that free market economics is not merely a series of insignificant accidents or coincidences, but rather a tapestry of measures that have culminated from an exquisite side of the human psyche. That is to say, that if policy makers are to choose wisely we must recognize the fundamental principles of our system; how a complex organized, and smoothly running system can develop and flourish without central direction, and how coordination can be achieved without coercion (Friedman and Friedman, Free to Choose).

Prior to divulging into the economic and political views of Milton Friedman, we must recognize that much like the free market, a man’s measure is also no mere coincidence. On July 31, 1912, Jeno Saul Friedman and Sarah Ethel Landau bore their fourth child, and only son for which they named Milton. Having immigrated from Berehovo, Ukraine -formerly part of Hungary and Czechoslovakia- to the United States in 1890 and 1895 respectively, Milton’s parents knew the value of a dollar; and just 13 months into Milton’s life they moved to Rahway, New Jersey where his father ran a dry goods store.  Although their financial position was precarious, and no member of the family had been to college before, it was decided early that Milton would attend college (Champion of Economic Freedom).

Friedman attended Washington Public School, where he skipped the sixth grade and transferred to Columbus School in the seventh grade, both public schools in Rahway; and although he attended Hebrew school in the afternoon after public school and was “bar-mitzvahed,” Friedman became an agnostic at an early age of twelve (Champion of Economic Freedom).  From 1924-1928, Friedman attended Rahway High School where his favorite subjects were political science and geometry. Outside of his academic studies, he participated in sports, won an oratory competition, and almost read out the local public library (Ramrattan and Szenberg). He won a scholarship to attend Rutgers University in New Brunswick, NJ, which at the time was a private school.

Having a fascination with mathematics out of high school, Friedman majored in mathematics at Rutgers. Despite his fascination, Milton referred to himself as an “ignorant boy in a small town,” and that he “didn’t know what you used mathematics for…only…that it was used in the insurance industry somehow” (Friedman, Milton Friedman Interview). He took the actuarial exams, but since he failed some of them, he switched to economics. The economics department at Rutgers had two stalwart economists, Arthur F. Burns, who was writing his Ph.D. at Columbia, and Homer Jones who had been a student of Frank Knight, and completed graduate work at the University of Chicago. Friedman offered his abundant praise to them, for their teaching, influence and friendship. Friedman studied insurance and statistics with Homer Jones and it was Jones who introduced Friedman to the “Chicago view” of individual freedom and the right reform policy. Friedman wrote that “Had Homer not chosen to spend a couple of years teaching at Rutgers, I would almost certainly not have gone to Chicago.” He also remarked that besides being at the bottom of the Great Depression, “… becoming an economist seemed more relevant to the burning issues of the day than becoming an applied mathematician or an actuary” (Friedman, Milton Friedman Interview).

After finishing up his undergraduate degree at Rutgers, Friedman accepted a scholarship at the University of Chicago in 1932. At Chicago, Milton made one of the most important discoveries of his life upon taking Jacob Viner’s class on “Price and Distribution Theory.” Mr. Viner’s policy was to seat students alphabetically which landed Milton a seat beside a lovely woman named Rose Director. After courting each other for a few years Rose and Milton contemplated marriage, but decided that it would have to wait until they could maintain economic footing (Champion of Economic Freedom).

Aside from Milton’s new found love, he studied History of Economic Thought with Frank Knight, Monetary Theory with Lloyd Mints, and Correlation and Curve Fitting with Henry Schultz. Friedman noted: “I took courses enough to have the equivalent of a master’s degree in mathematics–which stood me in very good stead in my later career (Friedman and Friedman, Two Lucky People).“ Friedman received his M.A. from the University of Chicago in 1933, and with the encouragement of Schultz, was awarded a year’s fellowship to continue postgraduate studies at Columbia University. Friedman asserted that “the ideal combination for a budding economist was a year of study of Chicago, which emphasized theory, followed by a year of study at Columbia which emphasized institutional influences and empirical work–but only in that order, not the reverse” (Friedman and Friedman, Two Lucky People).

(Left to Right above: George Stigler, Milton Friedman, John Kenneth Galbraith)

(Left to Right above: George Stigler, Milton Friedman, John Kenneth Galbraith)

Friedman took a job with the National Resources Committee shortly after his graduation, making an annual income of $2600. Milton wrote of this period in his life that “… ironically, the New Deal was a lifesaver for us personally. The new government programs created a boom market for economists, especially in Washington; Absent the New Deal, it is far from clear that we could have gotten jobs as economists” (Friedman and Friedman, Two Lucky People). In 1937, Friedman left the NRC and joined the research staff of the National Bureau of Economic Research in New York City. With this steady flow of income from his economic work, Milton Friedman and Rose Director finally tied the knot in 1938 under full Jewish religious tradition. Rose would play a large part in Friedman’s work as they collaborated on many books and projects over their lives including their joint memoirs, “Two Lucky People.”

In 1940, Friedman accepted a job at the University of Wisconsin but was forced to resign within a year. Friedman had fallen into conflict with other members of the faculty over America’s entry into World War II, which Friedman favored and others opposed (Champion of Economic Freedom). During World War II, he worked in the Treasury Department, where he helped create the federal withholding tax system, a system in which we take for granted today; prior to that, Americans had paid their taxes in a single lump sum each year. During the last years of the war, he suspended economic research and was employed as a mathematical statistician by a special projects group at Columbia University, concentrating on problems of weapons design, military tactics and metallurgical experiments (Champion of Economic Freedom).

Read more…

Money Mischief

March 18th, 2010 Josh Fields View Comments

Who would have thought that a parody article could so wonderfully show some of the basic underpinnings of money.

From The Onion

“Though raising interest rates is unlikely at the moment, the Fed will of course act appropriately if we…if we…” said Bernanke, who then paused for a moment, looked down at his prepared statement, and shook his head in utter disbelief. “You know what? It doesn’t matter. None of this—this so-called ‘money’—really matters at all.”

“It’s just an illusion,” a wide-eyed Bernanke added as he removed bills from his wallet and slowly spread them out before him. “Just look at it: Meaningless pieces of paper with numbers printed on them. Worthless.”

According to witnesses, Finance Committee members sat in thunderstruck silence for several moments until Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT) finally shouted out, “Oh my God, he’s right. It’s all a mirage. All of it—the money, our whole economy—it’s all a lie!”

Screams then filled the Senate Chamber as lawmakers and members of the press ran for the exits, leaving in their wake aisles littered with the remains of torn currency.

As news of the nation’s collectively held delusion spread, the economy ground to a halt, with dumbfounded citizens everywhere walking out on their jobs as they contemplated the little green drawings of buildings and dead white men they once used to measure their adequacy and importance as human beings.

At the New York Stock Exchange, Wednesday morning’s opening bell echoed across a silent floor as the few traders who arrived for work out of habit looked up blankly at the meaningless scrolling numbers on the flashing screens above.

“I’ve spent 25 years in this room yelling ‘Buy, buy! Sell, sell!’ and for what?” longtime trader Michael Palermo said. “All I’ve done is move arbitrary designations of wealth from one column to another, wasting my life chasing this unattainable hallucination of wealth.”

“What a cruel cosmic joke,” he added. “I’m going home to hug my daughter.” Read more…

Milton Friedman: Real and Pseudo Gold Standards

August 13th, 2009 Josh Fields View Comments

by Milton Friedman
Mont Pelerin Society
September 1961

International monetary arrangements have held a consistently important place among the topics discussed at the meetings of our [Mont Pelerin] Society. This is eminently fitting, since there is probably no other major facet of economic policy with respect to which liberals (in the sense of our Society) reach such divergent conclusions from the same underlying principles.

One group, of which Philip Cortney is a distinguished member, favors a continuation of the formal linking of national currencies to gold, rigid exchange rates between different national currencies, a doubling or more than doubling of the official price of gold in terms of national currencies, and an abandonment of governmental measures designed to evade the discipline of gold. This group is apparently indifferent about whether gold circulates as coin; it is satisfied with a gold bullion standard.

A second group, represented by the Economists’ National Committee on Monetary Policy, also favors a continuation of the formal linking of national currencies to gold together with rigid exchange rates between different national currencies. But it emphasizes the importance of gold coinage and of a widespread use of gold coin as money in national as well as international payments. Apparently, this group believes there is no need for a change in present official prices of gold, or, at least, in the Unites States price.

A third group, of which I count myself a member, favors a separation of gold policy from exchange-rate policy. It favors the abandonment of rigid exchange rates between national currencies and the substitution of a system of floating exchange rates determined from day to day by private transactions without government intervention.

With respect to gold, there are some differences, but most of us would currently favor the abandonment of any commitment by governments to buy and sell gold at fixed prices and of any fixed gold reserve requirements for the issue of national currency as well as the repeal of any restrictions on private dealings in gold.

I have stated and defended my own policy views elsewhere at some length. Hence, I would like to use this occasion instead to explore how it is that liberals can reach such radically different conclusions. Read more…

Paul Krugman’s many flaws

May 22nd, 2009 Josh Fields View Comments

krugmanthecontraryindicatorPaul Krugman, a Nobel winning economists, has found himself as the new voice of Keynesianism; a form of economics which supports the idea that government spending indeed helps to lead to economic prosperity. Krugman supposedly has a track record of predicting economic crisis while maintaining his Keynesian mantra. He is a staunch supporter of government spending and has even said on February 2, 2008, that:

“One thing I’ve written about a number of times, but becomes especially worth emphasizing now that John McCain is the presumptive Republican nominee, is the myth of runaway federal spending under the Bush administration… But one thing he thinks he knows is that the Bush administration has been spending like a drunken sailor. Has it?

Consider the actual record of spending. Never mind dollar figures, which grow because of inflation, population growth, and other normal factors. A better guide is spending as a percentage of GDP. And this has increased, from 18.5% in fiscal 2001 to 20% in fiscal 2007.”

He then went on to state on February 19th, 2008, that:

Bush is right about something

Hate to say this, but he’s right when he says

I think actually the spending in the war might help with jobs…because we’re buying equipment, and people are working. I think this economy is down because we built too many houses and the economy’s adjusting.

In fact, I’d say that the sources of the economy’s expansion from 2003 to 2007 were, in order, the housing bubble, the war, and — very much in third place — tax cuts.

Of course, we could have gotten just as much or more stimulus by spending $10 billion a month on actually useful stuff– think how much domestic infrastructure could have been built or repaired for the cost of this miserable war. But the war was what we got.

Read more…


Your Ad Here